More Pages: Perry Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92


The science of writing and flow....4.5 stars
Mysteries of the mind revealed.The day it arrived, I curled under my afghan with a mug of cocoa and found myself hooked from page one. It's safe to say I read in flow. I tuned out my singing cockatiel, Howie Birdell, and ignored the pleading eyes of my sheltie, Rudy, who simply wanted a game of tug. I hope they forgave me.
Dr. Perry researched and compiled interviews with more than 75 accomplished writers, asking them to probe their brains and describe their feelings about the creative process. Dr. Perry's diligent research paid off. Through her book, I learned how the pros handle writer's block, how they deal with distractions, how they wave their own pom-poms for self-motivation.
For me, WRITING IN FLOW isn't a one-time read. I'll refer to it often because the many ideas offered throughout the book deserve time and reflection. I'm sure I'll learn new concepts to apply to my writing every time I read it. If you're interested in exploring the mysteries of creativity, then this book will expand your horizons, too, and help you maximize your potential.
Inspiring Weaving of art and science

2 1/2 stars - What did I miss?The entire book dragged. The killer might be called psychotic (I believe it means they can't tell the difference between right and wrong), but I believes he does, he just doesn't care what is right or wrong. The killer's history isn't interesting but we're exposed to a plethora of it. The minutea of his life doesn't enhance my knowledge of his character, especially since he's certainly not a sympathetic character.
The title describes the story. However the biggest disappointment to me was the careless fashion in which the pursuer constantly and incompetently lets the killer get away. Why there wasn't a poison gas canister in the trap in Buffalo, why there wasn't a source of lethal electricity in the house in Minnesota, amazes me. Granted hindsight is 20/20, but we're talking about the pursuer having weeks to plan. Finally, there are a minimum of 4 unnecessary deaths of probably good people before the pursuer follows the course of action he should have in the first place.
I'm sorry, this book started well with a nice set up that appeared to be a contest of cleverness, and dragged into a plodding story in which I just wanted to get it over with.
A good readSo what keeps this novel from being among Perry's best? Two things:
1. Although it is interesting to see things from the antagonist's point of view, he is not a terribly interesting creation--pretty much a montage of stereotypical killers from psycho/spy novels. The time he spends hiding out does not so much illuminate his character (as Prescott's down-time does) as simply provide more of the same. Although the structural parallelling of the two characters' actions is stylistically intriguing, Varney is too conventional for this trick to work well.
2. The multiple points of view prevent the reader forming a real bond with Prescott. It would be interesting to deal with the cognitive dissonance created by identification with an ambivalent character, but just when you start to like him, you get a dose of Varney or Millikan, thus interrupting the connection.
These minor stylistic difficulties aside, this book is easily worth the money you'll spend on it and provides more entertainment than most authors pack into two novels.
Thomas Perry strikes again!

the best book I know as an introduction to leadership
This book is a collection of excellent advice for leaders.
This book is solid food for thought for all managers.

Blood is a powerful signTold through a series of flashbacks to various time periods and ancestors interspersed with scenes from Lizzie's present and past, this book is at first confusing and hard to follow -- yet it is always intriguing. This narrative style reflects Lizzie's own struggle: her life becomes disjointed and confusing as her identity and memories become entangled with those of her ancestors. As observed by a Catholic priest who offers comfort to Lizzie, the "blood [of her stigmata] is a powerful sign." This blood could serve as a symbol for the interconnectedness of generations whose history shapes the present.
If you enjoy a thinker's book, the kind that leads you to discover meaning without just laying it out plain as day, the kind with rich symbolism, pick up Stigmata. It'll give you lots to think about.
The Ties That BindTold through a series of flashbacks to various time periods and interspersed with scenes from Lizzie's present and past, this book is complex and at times confusing and hard to follow. In spite of this flaw, Perry manages to pull off a powerful and imaginative debut novel which is refreshing and creatively crafted. Stigmata is an engrossing tale that will stay with you long after you've read the book.
Intriguing....

INTERESTING BUT NOT ART
An important book[Some] have complained that the photographs in this book are not "artistic" enough. As I see it, the importance and beauty of this book is its willingness to portray women's genitals in an honest, non-sexualized way. Art or abstraction is entirely opposite to the purpose of portraying the reality of women's bodies, as free as possible from the typical conceptions of Western culture (think of how naked women are usually shown in canonical art, or, better yet, pornography). The remark one reader made that many of the vulvas depicted would scare male readers is quite telling. They might scare a lot of readers, and the confrontation and analysis of that fear is what makes this book immensely important rather than just visually beautiful.
Femalia

Love Perry, However the book sagged by endSecurity consultant, Max Stillman, is called in to clean up the mess. Grabbing data analyst, John Walker, from McLaren's San Francisco headquarters to assist him, because he knew Ellen intimately, the two set off across the country, tracking Ellen and the money. Stillman's convinced she's guilty of insurance fraud. Walker is sure she's innocent and sticks with Stillman and the case to protect and defend her. But what these two find, at the end of the road, shocks and surprises even Max Stillman, and he's seen it all. However at a certain point the obvious becomes apparent and the three of them trapped in this town that kills for cash is played well but never pays off.
What hurts the book is that we're total outsiders to this town and its residents so they're all violent zombies attacking the heroes. There is no connection to the villains, they're just a mass facelss mob. If Ellen had been one of them then we could see some motivation see some betrayal, some game played. I love Thomas Perry's work but no one is close to getting into the scrapes that Jane Whitefield does and gets out of.
Max Stillman is good, not a Jane but good. John just gets to be a newbie and the chickie who loves computers is just there as a sex convenience and DC-esque Oracle.
A nice ride but don't expect the bells and whistles and porterhous you get with 4 out of 5 of teh Jane Whitefield books. This is a departure when instead there should have been some kind of combo action. Jane trying to hide Ellen as Max.John and towns[people close in all for different reasons. Now that wou;d've been interesting.
A page turner? Ehhhh, a finisher. You're 100 pages in, might as well finish it.
A page turner!While I am more familiar with Perry's Jane Whitfield series, which by the way are excellent, this mystery is rich in excitement, detail and well-developed characters.
A scam has been perpetuated against the McClaren Insurance company and Max Stillman, an insurance investigator, picks John Walker to help him because John had been very close to Ellen Snyder, a woman who has also disappeared. In their search for Ellen and some leads about the missing 10 million they encounter several bad guys and get roughed up and a computer specialist who can seemingly get into any data base. When a hurricane hits Florida, John is not only caught in the midst of it but uncovers a thread of the scam they are investigating. Several clever deductions lead John Max and Mary Catherine Casey ( John's new girl friend) to a small New Hampshire town that proves to be the base of a much larger scam than they started with.
The last 100 pages of the mystery are a real screamer and will keep you reading late into the night as John, Max and Mary struggle to save their lives and return with the story.
Once again Thomas Perry has not disappointed me. The only tiny point of criticism is that John's relationship with Max seems much too unlikely. He follows Max with too obligingly. Never-the-less and excellent read.
Great Read!

Jane Whitefield Strikes Again
Jane Whitefield takes on the MafiaI found the premise of this novel intrigueing. Perry handled the whole idea of donating the money to charities in a plausible fashion as well as still keeping the heat turned up on the heroine and her charges. Just when you think they're all home free Mr. Perry throws another monkey wrench into the deal. As usual, Jane is a well drawn character, the plot moves along nicely, and the dialog is believable. Perry, unlike many of today's genre writers, actually puts suspense into the suspense novel. Try this book, I think you'll like it. And then, if you haven't already, find the rest of the Jane Whitefield novels and read them too. You could certainly do a lot worse.
A Vanishing Plot?

Zany and fun but certainly not memorable.The opening chapter written by Nevada Barr sets up the story and, in my opinion, was the driest, dullest entry in the entire book. It's here that the lifeless main characters are introduced (luckily they don't stay that way!). After the recent death of her father, Caroline, wife of a big shot Congressman, agrees to spend some quality bonding time with her difficult mother at a high-end health spa. Caroline's fellow guests at the spa include an aging rock legend, a quirky psychic, a starving model and loads of other oddballs and Hollywood "it" types.
After the sloooow start, JD Robb picks up the tempo in chapter two. She breaths life into Caroline's character by bringing her down to earth in a funny little adventure brought about by hunger. She also adds a hunky pool-boy to the ever growing list of characters and kicks things into high gear by killing off the snooty spa owner!
Things get silly as each character seems to harbor some dirty secret and the murder count becomes ridiculously high as each author adds their own little twists and turns to the story and attempts to pick up where the previous author left off. A friend of mine described the characters as "manic depressives" and she was right on. Each character switches moods and personalities from chapter to chapter which only added to the sense of fun. Eventually, all dangling threads and over-the-top plot twists were neatly brought together by author Laurie King.
I'd read another book like Naked Came The Phoenix for the fun factor alone. But would I read this one again? Umm, probably not.
What a hoot!
A definite delightAt the spa, Caroline's mother remains her usual obnoxious manipulative self though perhaps acting a bit more bizarre than usual. The owner of the spa Claudia de Vries, her mother's college roommate, behaves even weirder than Hilda does. However, Claudia's behavior becomes moot, as someone murders her. The police and Caroline conduct separate inquiries even while other patrons die.
NAKED CAME THE PHOENIX is an entertaining collaboration from thirteen of the leading female mystery writers on the market today. The story line is fun though the line up of superstars tend to void pronouncements from the previous chapters. Still, the plot seems fresh due to Caroline who is the one consistency throughout the who-done-it. For the most part the authors provided strong entries that help make NAKED CAME THE PHOENIX a likable story. What else would you expect from a who's who consisting of Nevada Barr, J.D. Robb, Nancy Pickard, Lisa Scottoline, Perri O'Shaugnessy, J.A. Jance, Faye Kellerman, Mary Jane Clark, Marcia Talley, Anne Perry, Diana Gabaldon, Val McDermid, and Laurie King.
Harriet Klausner


Excellent, excellent
Thomas Perry and Jane Whitefield--a marriage made in HeavenRead *Vanishing Act*, *Shadow Woman*, and *Dance for the Dead*. These are the must-haves of the series. Perry manages to create a believable Seneca world while maintaining a respectful distance, and his intricate plotting sustains each book. Read for the plot, read for the Indians: either way, you'll be happy.
A fast-paced, well-wrought crime novel.
BUT
Writing in Flow is a very good on the verge of great book. It follows groundbreaking work of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. (Creativity : Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention) In writing in Flow Perry through interviews with 75 best-selling and award winning writers and poets to find out what is this flow thing? How does it work? how do you get there and how long are you there? The feedback from the writers is the real treat of this book. It's a real treat to hear how different writers deal with being blocked, or getting into flow or writing in general. Throught writing in flow perry gives you lessons what she calls master keys. These master keys are exercises that are supposed to help you get into the flow of writing. There are also sections in which writing specific questions are asked to the author and the author responds. I also found that to be very useful. Perry's book is extensively researched. There is a notes, section , a footnotes section there's even an appendix in which she goes into detail the who, what, when and where of her research. Another thing that I liked about Writing in Flow was that the author didn't try to find a one way to understand and get into flow. Her insights are alot like an good investagative reporter who not only finds out what she's looking for but also finds the contradictions. The answers to the who what when where and how are there but there not as simple as 1-2-3. In the end there are no hugeground breaking discoveries about writing although i found a few small ground rumbling insights. Not a perfect book but I found this book to be extrtemely useful. It really helped my look at writing from a different perspective. Recommended with little or no reservations.